I agree also.

While  flawed.
His papers are weak, tough and esentially unfair to the students



The Free Movement of goods problem was obscure and non-sensical.
It was the first non-sensical


On Apr 3, 5:19 pm, aviationhead <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree. That was defo the most challenging paper I have come accross.
> Much worse than Company last week and I was sure I had failed that.
> Perhaps not so sure any more!!
>
> Why he put up a question on the Commission, which I would think is the
> institution that has the least talking points, is beyond me.
>
> As for The sources question, I had prepared in detail the areas of
> discrimination and the fundamental rights, thinking they may come up
> as separate questions, but to have to outline them both in the one
> question (along with legitimate expectations) was asking a lot.
>
> I could easily find fault with every question on the paper so I
> suppose I had just better say that it was horrible and Im glad that
> you all think the same.
>
> Lets hope his marking scheme is a little fairer!!
>
> On Apr 3, 4:02 pm, lukin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > it was definitely one of the toughest eu papers, let alone blackhalls
> > I have ever sat - and i've sat all of them besides tort.
>
> > Noel travers deserves an absolute kicking right in the behind for the
> > type of questions he puts up. I would be absolutely positively shocked
> > if more that one handful of people could satisfactorily answer the
> > case note question - having learnt 10 "seminal cases" from all across
> > the course, you would think one be covered - not could I do one.
>
> > The direct effect question was all over the place.
>
> > Part A of the competition law question was one of the most confusing
> > questions I have ever read. The fact that Mr. Travers thought it
> > prudent to give "nicknames" to almost every relevant party ("stayers",
> > "goers", etc etc etc).
>
> > I have no problem with a testing paper - having covered all the
> > course, I truly can say I was not happy with one question I attempted
> > today.
>
> > It's funny these exams are set by people who have never have been
> > within an asses' roar of having to study/sit a blackhall.
>
> > On Apr 3, 3:01 pm, tiger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Hey all
>
> > > I thought it was fairly bad as well. plus, the commission question - I
> > > wrote an awful lot from the treaty. Don't know whether I can get any
> > > marks for that.
>
> > > The article 82 question was tough too - the dual role? Anyone know
> > > what that was about?
>
> > > On Apr 3, 2:58 pm, molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > God,that was crap. Only got to do 4 quetions and The question on free
> > > > movement of goods was completely bizarre, Could not figure out its
> > > > relevance to that area at all. I mean fixing tinted stickers or
> > > > whatever to car windows? How does that restrict the free movement of
> > > > goods? Kept looking at it thinking I must be missing something.
>
> > > > On Apr 3, 1:39 pm, Richard Power <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > good bit off work not whole course but a alot of study and prob for 
> > > > > nothing!!!
>
> > > > > last one aswell and was hoping bhall but may have to wait.....
>
> > > > > the paper was all on the difficult aspects of ec law, the one on 
> > > > > direct effect took about an hr to understand!!!
>
> > > > > > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:26:45 -0700
> > > > > > Subject: EU Post Mortem
> > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > > > > I found that paper really tough - it was my last exam and I think 
> > > > > > I've
> > > > > > completely screwed my chances of going to B'hall this year -
>
> > > > > > Can someone explain what question five was all about please? I had 
> > > > > > no
> > > > > > idea how the second and third parts related to FMG?!!
>
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > > Get 30 Free Emoticons for your Windows Live 
> > > > > Messengerhttp://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/funfamily/en-ie/-Hidequotedtext
> > > > >  -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 
Study Group" group.
 To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to