The rules on construction are just that - the rules cts use when interpreting contracts...i.e. The principles in investors compensation scheme v west bromwich b.s. (1998) as applied in irish cts. There are very recent judgments on this from clarke j and finlay geoghegan j. No matter what, however, the rules on construction are a discrete and defined set of principles. You can throw in other aspects such as contra pref., but you really need base the essay around the above. Lewinson's interpretation of contracts 3rd ed, is good on this
Sent using Vodafone Business Email -----Original Message----- From: ellenellen <[email protected]> Sent: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:21:51 -0700 (PDT) To: FE-1 Study Group <[email protected]> Received: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:21:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: CONTRACT // TORT Hi Just wondering if there is a question on the rules of construction, what does that include? Am I right in presuming that it does not cover the parol evidence rule and the difference between a warranty and mere representation?? Are the rules dealing with implied terms and the relative importance of contractual terms to be covered such as intelligent bystander rule? In Tort, I am totally confused about this scope/ course test i Vicarious Liability. Which one are you to use....or is it really not relevant. None of the caselaw seem to even draw a difference...so why does the manual?? Please help!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
