Sorry to the promissory estoppel people but this was Proprietary Estoppel , Promise, Reliance, Detriment and the case are
Dillwyn v. Llewellyn Ramsden v. Dyson (to some degree) Taylor Fashions Ltd v. Liverpool Victoria Trustee Co Ltd Yeoman’s Row Management Limited and Another V. Cobbe Willmott v. Barber (1880) Phoenix Smyth v. John Joseph Halpin and another10 McCaron v. McCaron and most recently C.D v. J.D.F Promissory estoppel can only be used as a shield and has nothing to do with the exam question posed. You had to go through each section and throw out a case Promise, Reliance, Detriment and include the whole Testamentary disposition (small note on valid will , codicil etc ) and the overall likelihood of success for John which to my mind was zero and in any event a court would likely award some damages in stead of denying the common law right of his sister. On Oct 5, 7:01 pm, Jev <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm... seems I hit reply to author instead of reply. > > Anyway, the jist of what I was saying is that the question was on > proprietary! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
