Yeah, I was talking to my Equity lecturer afterwards and he said "how about the question on proprietary estoppel, huh? Lovely!" (or something along those lines) :P
On 12 oct, 16:24, Aoife McBennett <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Rose Marie - relief! > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:25 AM, Rose Marie <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Aoife, don't worry about it! It was most definitely proprietary > > estoppel!! > > > On Oct 5, 4:32 pm, Aoife McBennett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > was that promissory or proprietary estoppel? please say proprietary? > > > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ruddy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Definately a nice paper, though all papers are nice if you know the > > > > stuff! > > > > > Couldnt believe some of the questions, e.g, promissory estoppel and > > > > charitbale trusts/cypres were verbatim repeats of recent exams! > > > > > Anyone got anything useful to add about contract this friday?? > > > > > On Oct 5, 3:39 pm, lucylou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Well how did everyone find equity? A lovely paper if you only had > > > > > equity to be thinking about I would think! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
