Sure. Honestly, in the absence of the "new" Acts, I (myself) just would have tried to divide the labour and done contract and equity together (nice overlap at times) and then chosen either EU or constitutional and then either criminal or property, and then do the balance the next time...e.g.
Contract, equity, constitutional and criminal followed by EU, property, company and tort. But like I say, no-one really knows what effect the treaty / acts will have on the paper and if one had the choice, I'd like to see a paper go ahead of me first! I would try and mix contract with equity though. Saves you time on estoppel and mistake and other equitable doctrines we look at in contract. And whereas proprietary estoppel ain't on the equity syllabus (but is asked) having done it in equity helps (but we look at it anyway in contract). So maybe try and mix equity and contract as priority 1. B -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LawGeek Sent: 10 October 2009 17:29 To: FE-1 Study Group Subject: Re: ''Easiest'' FE1 Subjects Hi Brian Thanks for the message. These are the first time I have sat the FE1's - really struggle with EU and am actually considering swapping EU with Equity for the next sittings in March. Therefore the subjects I am thinking of sitting are Property, Tort and Constitutional (all three again) plus adding Equity to the mix. Would that be a sensible choice?? On Oct 10, 5:20 pm, "Brian Foley BL" <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think that leaving EU, Company and Property over for at least one > more sitting is a good idea just to see how the exams "settle" in light of > the new Acts / Treaties for each subject. > > Brian > > GCD > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of nilomu > Sent: 10 October 2009 14:05 > To: FE-1 Study Group > Subject: Re: ''Easiest'' FE1 Subjects > > is that the first time you sat them??? think most people would sit > equity, contract, criminal and one other on their first sitting, > they're usually the easier ones. but then theres not a lot you can > leave out of either contract or criminal. each to their own but i > would have found it really difficult to sit the 4 you just sat in one > sitting! > > On 10 Oct, 09:48, LawGeek <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just sat EU, Tort, Property and Constitutional for the FE1's and am > > sure I didn't get them. > > > I am considering swapping EU with Equity for the next sittings. Is > > Equity easier than EU?? > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: 10/10/09 > 06:39:00- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: 10/10/09 06:39:00 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
