I agree - and advise from any quarter, professional or other wise is greatly appreciated - thats what the forum is based on.
On Oct 27, 9:55 am, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > no u cant not post! iv found ur advice invalueable! y cant we all just get > along!!!!!! > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:13 AM, brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Figured as much - I think (like i said above) there was some issue > > with people being described as such! > > > I think, however, that my presence here seems to prompted the desire > > for others to be on. Maybe you'd rather none of it? > > > Happy to not post again, if it just ends up breeding "gcd v indep" > > malarky on here too. > > > B > > > On Oct 26, 6:03 pm, Caribou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Independent Colleges are NOT the Administrators of this group - it was > > > set up by Padraig and myself and a few others help him moderate it. > > > > I did notice that Independent Colleges have changed themselves to > > > 'Administrator' (which they are not) - however, i also note, that > > > sometimes, if a user has changed their name on another google group. > > > to say, Administrator, then it sometimes transfers to other google > > > groups, like this. I'm willing to give Independent Colleges benefit of > > > the doubt that this was the reason! However, i will be asking them to > > > make sure it doesn't transfer in the future. > > > > On Oct 26, 5:03 pm, brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Sorry .Denning...I missed this post... > > > > > Honestly, I'd say "no" in the sense that I just think there is > > > > something wrong with intentionally not focussing on an exam you're > > > > registered for. Maybe the problem what was you left to late - to > > > > study by heart? These (and any other law exams) aren't about that at > > > > all. Maybe you're better to learn from mistakes, and give the four a > > > > better shot. A lot of people work full time, and its really about > > > > finding small (but consistent) pockets of time to get things done. > > > > Really, once you get your hands on good nutshells and texts (up to > > > > date ones!), you don't *need* lectures if you are the type who can get > > > > that consistent work done. Some find the lectures help them focus, > > > > but honestly...with a little dedication and consistency, you'd be > > > > amazed. > > > > > If you want to talk about this outside of the forum, email me - the > > > > address is there. > > > > > And who knew independent colleges were actually the administrator of > > > > this group? :) I'm assuming, of course, there is some weird issue > > > > with describing people as administrators, but welcome Philip Burke! > > > > > On Oct 12, 9:32 am, Denning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Brian, > > > > > > I was just wondering if it is advisible to focus just on three > > > > > subjects say company, criminal and equity? I work full time, and my > > > > > 1st sitting was a disaster, as I left it too late to study by > > heart:-( > > > > > > On Oct 10, 5:20 pm, "Brian Foley BL" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I would think that leaving EU, Company and Property over for at > > least one > > > > > > more sitting is a good idea just to see how the exams "settle" in > > light of > > > > > > the new Acts / Treaties for each subject. > > > > > > > Brian > > > > > > > GCD > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of nilomu > > > > > > Sent: 10 October 2009 14:05 > > > > > > To: FE-1 Study Group > > > > > > Subject: Re: ''Easiest'' FE1 Subjects > > > > > > > is that the first time you sat them??? think most people would sit > > > > > > equity, contract, criminal and one other on their first sitting, > > > > > > they're usually the easier ones. but then theres not a lot you can > > > > > > leave out of either contract or criminal. each to their own but i > > > > > > would have found it really difficult to sit the 4 you just sat in > > one > > > > > > sitting! > > > > > > > On 10 Oct, 09:48, LawGeek <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I just sat EU, Tort, Property and Constitutional for the FE1's > > and am > > > > > > > sure I didn't get them. > > > > > > > > I am considering swapping EU with Equity for the next sittings. > > Is > > > > > > > Equity easier than EU?? > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > > > Checked by AVG -www.avg.com > > > > > > Version: 8.5.421 / Virus Database: 270.14.9/2427 - Release Date: > > 10/10/09 > > > > > > 06:39:00- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
