i didnt think that false imprisonment would hold up as she got up to leave after he uttered his words to her- showing that her individual character was strong enough to show that his words didnt leave her thinking that she couldnt leave- as in the case where the ticket inspector came after the girl but she told the taxi man to leave- also her action to swing her back was voluntary and deliberate so it would constitute a battery- thats just how i dealt with it-
----Original Message---- From: [email protected] Date: 20-Mar-2010 20:03 To: "FE-1 Study Group"<[email protected]> Subj: Re: Tort Exam Hi all, Definitely a little obscure this time round. Found it ok thou, got four and a half done before having the paper ripped off me. How did people approach the assault, battery, false imprisonment question?? Very curious to know. Was also surprised that separate questions appeared on vicarious liability and employers liability, but happy at the same time. Best of luck to everyone for the rest of them. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to fe-1-study-gr...@googlegroups. com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to fe-1-study- [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google. com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. I'm using Vodafone Mail - to get your free mobile email account go to http://www.vodafone.ie Use of Vodafone Mail is subject to Terms and Conditions http://www.vodafone.ie/terms/website -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
