so did anybody do Q8???
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Brian Foley BL <[email protected]>wrote: > I think from seeing the text of the question, the kernel where was > whether or not the non-delegation doctrine applies where the power isn’t to > pass statutory instruments, but only to make decisions – i.e. whether this > was an administrative discretion as in *Casey*. From the text shown to > me, it wasn’t the case that the Minister could pass regulations. He could > simply “limit…etc” which would raise the *Casey *issue and the other cases > where the courts have examined whether Article 15.2 is engaged at all and > whether *Cityview Press *is even relevant. > > > > Brian > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Rose Marie Zadorojny > Vilella > *Sent:* 23 March 2010 23:00 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: Constitutional Law Exam > > > > I focused on right to livelihood, proportionality (how the ban was > excessive).. but I did mention that the piece of legislation did set down > policies to be implemented, but that the Minister had misinterpreted his > powers.. maybe I was wrong! I was going to mention property (simply because > of whatever equipment he had, I thought it might be relevant that they were > telling us that they were worth so much money), but then left it at that! > > Yeah, you're right re freedom of expression in that religion question! > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:49 PM, TommyK <[email protected]> wrote: > > What did people reckon the issues were regarding the donegal fisherman > question?? I started with how the delegation didnt conform to cityview > press,no principle or policies in the act to follow...then mentioned > proportionality of 7 year ban....but i got really confused with what > other rights were involved...was it property?or right to livelihood?? > > Also im presuming that it was expression that went along wit religion > in Q1?! > > > On Mar 23, 9:41 pm, j s <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah I started on Q.6 and think I bottled it. I mentioned that the act > > pre-presumed Patrick's guilt as in King v AG and that he had a right to > be > > charged promptly. I also mentioned that the sentence may have been > > dispraportionate and tossed in some other stuff as well that I cannot > > remember. I awnsered a load of crap for Re health bill, really annoyed > now > > as I know alot of father's rights to a child but overlooked re nicolau! > > D'oh! > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Anita Byrne <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm very mixed about the paper... The first 4 questions I was happy > with > > > but the whole way through the exam I thought that question 6 was locus > > > standi and the minister just . But then when i got to answer the > question I > > > got all confused. Does anyone know what question 6 was it's really > annoying > > > me if I answered it on the wrong thing. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Sarah Falvey <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Everyone! > > > > >> How did you find the Constitutional law exam? > > > > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >> "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > >> To post to this group, send an email to > [email protected] > > >> . > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > >> [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]><fe-1-study-group%2Bunsubscrib > [email protected]> > > > >> . > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > > To post to this group, send an email to > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]><fe-1-study-group%2Bunsubscrib > [email protected]> > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2765 - Release Date: 03/23/10 > 07:33:00 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
