I was all over the place in Q2 as well, it was my last question. I threw anything I had at it, intention to create legal relations, certainty, parol evidence rule exception, tried to put in implied terms but as you say yourself that was a mistake, I even tried to put in the whole thing about contracts of over a year needing to be in writing thing, totally chanced my arm.
I did Q8a on remoteness of damages, god I hope that was what it was!! Anyone do the question that involved frustration of the reycling lease, frustration of the employees contracts, and the 17 year old in particular re: capacity. Were these the only 3 issues in the question or did I miss something?! On Sep 30, 2:22 pm, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > could somebody please tell me what issues were to be raised in q,2?? > > i completely messed up that question?? > > over all i thought the paper was very do-able, i messed my time up thanks to > q2,- i put in an implied term of customary practice which i know now makes > no sense since there was no written contract....ugh and then i panic and > rush- frantic, and the hall is boiling and my desk was wobbley. i wanted to > ask for a new desk but u know what its like theyd be like -why why this a > huge and massive deal and ur number is on this desk blah blah,,, also q.8 A- > was that remoteness of damages???? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
