does anyone have a copy of the paper they could upload? On Oct 3, 4:35 pm, Brian Foley <[email protected]> wrote: > It's not chancing your arm to put in the bit about the Statute...sure when > the case was run (i.e. assuming this was all based loosely on Dakota > Packagin) it was put up there by counsel and decided on by Peart J. It was > relevant, but needed discussion of the Dakota decision. > > On 3 October 2010 16:31, dee8839 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I was all over the place in Q2 as well, it was my last question. I > > threw anything I had at it, intention to create legal relations, > > certainty, parol evidence rule exception, tried to put in implied > > terms but as you say yourself that was a mistake, I even tried to put > > in the whole thing about contracts of over a year needing to be in > > writing thing, totally chanced my arm. > > > I did Q8a on remoteness of damages, god I hope that was what it was!! > > > Anyone do the question that involved frustration of the reycling > > lease, frustration of the employees contracts, and the 17 year old in > > particular re: capacity. Were these the only 3 issues in the question > > or did I miss something?! > > > On Sep 30, 2:22 pm, Orla Fitzpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > > > could somebody please tell me what issues were to be raised in q,2?? > > > > i completely messed up that question?? > > > > over all i thought the paper was very do-able, i messed my time up thanks > > to > > > q2,- i put in an implied term of customary practice which i know now > > makes > > > no sense since there was no written contract....ugh and then i panic and > > > rush- frantic, and the hall is boiling and my desk was wobbley. i wanted > > to > > > ask for a new desk but u know what its like theyd be like -why why this a > > > huge and massive deal and ur number is on this desk blah blah,,, also q.8 > > A- > > > was that remoteness of damages???? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "FE-1 Study Group" group. > > To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<fe-1-study-group%2Bunsubscrib > > [email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB. > > -- > > Brian Foley LL.B (Dub), Ph.D (Dub), Barrister-at-Law > > Law Library, Four Courts > Dublin 7, DX 818 074 > Ph: (085) 1483709 | (01) 817 7367 > Fax: (01) 507 8620 > > This E mail is from Brian Foley, Barrister-at-Law. The E-mail and any > files transmitted with it are confidential and may be privileged and are > intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are > addressed. If you are not the addressee you are prohibited from disclosing > its content, copying it or distributing it otherwise than to the addressee. > If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the > sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the e-mail from your computer.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
