Anyone have trouble with the lack of information Constitutional examiner provides in reports. Presently as im early into It im finding his lack of any info a nightmare. Does anyone logically know why he/ she does this. He will complain about the lack of precision by students post exam time but give no indication of what he wants pre exam. Is this a lazy thing on his part or to run with a conspiracy theory do Blackhall direct which examiner will make the flavour of the month subject the most awkward.
Anyone know who the Examiner is here and what the thinking is on this ?. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fe-1-study-group?hl=en-GB.
