On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Nelson, Clark <clark.nel...@intel.com> wrote: >> I’m not sure what, if any, is the process required/desired of such >> updates. > > As established at the Urbana meeting, the process is that the consensus we > need is of SG10, not WG21.
On that basis, I think it's sufficient for a change to have support on this mailing list, rather than having been visible to the full committee in a WG21 document, prior to being incorporated into SD-6 (with similar amounts of time allowed for objections). So, +1 to using the attachment, following Jens' proposal. _______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
