features  

Messages by Thread

• [SG10] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro David Vandevoorde
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro Jens Maurer
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro Jens Maurer
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] P1907R1 should have updated a feature test macro David Vandevoorde
• [SG10] Naming guidance for __cpp_constexpr_members_defined Barry Revzin
• [SG10] SG10 in Belfast Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] SG10 in Belfast Jens Maurer
• [SG10] Missing feature-test macros Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] Missing feature-test macros David Vandevoorde
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] [isocpp-lib] Missing feature-test macros Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] [isocpp-core] Missing feature-test macros Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] [isocpp-core] Missing feature-test macros Casey Carter
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] [isocpp-core] Missing feature-test macros Richard Smith
• [SG10] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> Billy O'Neal (VC LIBS)
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> JeanHeyd Meneide
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-lib] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> Marshall Clow
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> Daniel Krügler
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: missing feature test macro for <span> Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] nodiscard updates after Cologne? Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] nodiscard updates after Cologne? Aaron Ballman
  • Re: [SG10] nodiscard updates after Cologne? Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] nodiscard updates after Cologne? Barry Revzin
• [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Ben Craig
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature-test macros since 2017 Barry Revzin
• [SG10] freestanding interactions with feature test macros Ben Craig
• [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm Daniel Krügler
  • Re: [SG10] New issue: <memory> and <execution> should define __cpp_lib_parallel_algorithm Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Hubert Tong
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Hubert Tong
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Hubert Tong
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Casey Carter
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Barry Revzin
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Casey Carter
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] [isocpp-core] No __cpp_concepts in the C++20 draft Barry Revzin
• [SG10] Macro for P0458 Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Macro for P0458 John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] Macro for P0458 Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] New feature test macros John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] New feature test macros Hubert Tong
  • Re: [SG10] New feature test macros John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] New feature test macros Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] SG-10 meeting at lunch John Spicer
• [SG10] Where SG10 and SD-6 should go from here John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] Where SG10 and SD-6 should go from here Jens Maurer
• Re: [SG10] Feature Test Macro for destroying operator delete? Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] Feature Test Macro for destroying operator delete? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] Feature Test Macro for destroying operator delete? Bjarne Stroustrup
  • Re: [SG10] Feature Test Macro for destroying operator delete? Ville Voutilainen
• [SG10] Feature-testing macros for spaceship operator Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] Feature-testing macros for spaceship operator Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] Feature-testing macros for spaceship operator Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] Feature-testing macros for spaceship operator Jens Maurer
• [SG10] SD-6 gives wrong header for __cpp_lib_to_chars Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] Is __cpp_lib_constexpr_char_traits "official"? Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Is __cpp_lib_constexpr_char_traits "official"? Richard Smith
• [SG10] missing feature test macros Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] missing feature test macros Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] no feature test macro for destroying delete Richard Smith
• [SG10] __cpp_lib_tuple_element_t should be defined in <tuple> not <utility> Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_lib_tuple_element_t should be defined in <tuple> not <utility> Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] bump __cpp_deduction_guides to 201703 for P0620? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] bump __cpp_deduction_guides to 201703 for P0620? Jason Merrill
• [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Herb Sutter
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Herb Sutter
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Bjarne Stroustrup
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Bjarne Stroustrup
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Herb Sutter
  • Re: [SG10] Example for __cpp_lib_byte Richard Smith
• [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Herb Sutter
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Herb Sutter
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Ville Voutilainen
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] A feature macro for mandatory copy elision Richard Smith
• [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6: ready for C++17? Aaron Ballman
• [SG10] P0032R3: Homogeneous interface for variant, any and optional Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] P0032R3: Homogeneous interface for variant, any and optional Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] P0032R3: Homogeneous interface for variant, any and optional Nelson, Clark
• [SG10] Filesystem questions Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] Filesystem questions Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] List of headers for _cpp_lib_incomplete_container_elements Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] New revision of SD-6 Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] New revision of SD-6 Daniel Krügler
• [SG10] Meeting date Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] Meeting date John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] Meeting date Nelson, Clark
• [SG10] FW: About p0697r0 — how SD-6 unclear status proved harmful to me Herb Sutter
• [SG10] Bump value of __cpp_lib_chrono for P0505R0? Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Bump value of __cpp_lib_chrono for P0505R0? Richard Smith
• [SG10] Macro for P0084R2: Emplace Return Type Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Agustín Bergé
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Eric Fiselier
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Agustín Bergé
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Agustín Bergé
  • Re: [SG10] New is_aggregate trait Richard Smith
• [SG10] Missing feature macro for threadsafe function local statics Daniel Krügler
  • Re: [SG10] Missing feature macro for threadsafe function local statics Jason Merrill
• [SG10] Should P0127R1 (Declaring non-type template arguments with auto) have its own feature test macro? Jordi Vilar
• [SG10] Checking __has_include on its own is not sufficient Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Checking __has_include on its own is not sufficient Jens Maurer
  • Re: [SG10] Checking __has_include on its own is not sufficient Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Checking __has_include on its own is not sufficient John Spicer
• [SG10] Keld, can you add me to this reflector? Thomas Schunior Plum
• [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Ed Smith-Rowland
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Saleem Abdulrasool
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Adding a macro to identify the ABI Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] Macro for P0522R0? Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] Macro for P0522R0? Richard Smith
• [SG10] __cpp_variadic_using for p0195r2? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_variadic_using for p0195r2? John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_variadic_using for p0195r2? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_variadic_using for p0195r2? John Spicer
• [SG10] std::sample missing from SD-6 Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Aaron Ballman
  • Re: [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] __has_cpp_attribute example Nelson, Clark
• [SG10] __cpp_deduction_guides for P0091? Jason Merrill
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_deduction_guides for P0091? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_deduction_guides for P0091? Richard Smith
  • Re: [SG10] __cpp_deduction_guides for P0091? Jason Merrill
• [SG10] SD-6 document structure Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6 document structure John Spicer
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6 document structure Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6 document structure Jens Maurer
  • Re: [SG10] SD-6 document structure Jonathan Wakely
• [SG10] Meeting schedule Nelson, Clark
• [SG10] Updated SD-6 draft Nelson, Clark
  • Re: [SG10] Updated SD-6 draft Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Updated SD-6 draft Jonathan Wakely
  • Re: [SG10] Updated SD-6 draft Nelson, Clark

• Earlier messages