I don't expect user code to be influenced by this as much as the actual runtime implementation.
Although the differences in PMFs could require different behaviors, I think that encouraging users to use more portable code is preferable. As to examples of the runtime changing would be the implementation of std::type_info. On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 12:57 AM Jens Maurer <jens.mau...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 01/07/2017 10:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > > > As to your point of how the language runtime/ABI library would be > influenced by this is exactly the motivation for this! > > > > I'm sorry, could I please see user code that would plausibly > > depend on an ABI switch? > > > > Our existing #defines are rather fine-grained; I'm wondering whether > > a broad ABI switch is adequate for the use-cases. > > > > Jens > >
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
