On Sat, 14 Sep 2019, 17:25 Daniel Krügler, <daniel.krueg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 13:51 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely <c...@kayari.org > >: > > > > There is no feature test macro for std::span. > > > > For the purposes of SD-6, I think we want two values: 201803L for the > original addition of <span> by P0122R7 (Jacksonville, 2018) and then > 201902L for the API changes from P1024R3 (Kona, 2019). The C++ working > draft only needs the newer value. > > > > Proposed resolution: > > > > Add a row to [tab:support.ft] in [support.limits.general]: > > > > __cpp_lib_span 201902L <span> > > A new issue has been created, please reload and double-check: > > https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3274 > > To everyone else responding to this thread: An issue submission is not > a priority vote. Please wait for the corresponding reflector thread. > > @Jonathan: Submitting an issue and adding at the same time the LWG > reflector list on CC has IMO a lot of disadvantages: It adds > additional discussion about the suggested wording (So that I have to > start figuring out the actual submission content based on a > potentially long email thread) and people start voting on it, like in > this case. Please separate the submission email from an LWG discussion > about that issue in the future (Just remove the lwgchair address from > the second kind of email). > The intention was to give the reflector a heads up about the new issue. I will avoid doing so in future, sorry for complicating things.
_______________________________________________ Features mailing list Features@isocpp.open-std.org http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
