> Do we want in the examples > __has_include(<optional>), etc. > or > __has_include(<experimental/optional>), etc.
> I thought the experimental headers aren't in with the std headers. This is certainly on the long list of questions that arise as a result of all the work that the committee is doing on technical specifications. We'll be discussing that subject in Rapperswil. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
