Nelson, Clark wrote: > On the other hand, the change corresponding to > "__cpp_lib_exchange_function" introduced just a single name: "exchange". > Again, there's an emotional reaction to just "__cpp_lib_exchange".
For the sake of similar features having a common prefix in the future, you might consider "__cpp_lib_function_exchange" instead. Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
