> > For my money, if the only plausible use of a feature-test macro would be to > > control a #error directive, that's not enough justification to create the > > macro. Here's how SD-6 already says it:
> OK, I think this is an entirely reasonable position. On that basis, I think > we do not want a macro for N4051. (I think we also don't want a > __cpp_digit_separators macro; how do we feel about removing it from our > recommendations?) Here's an elliptical answer: we have a precedent for doing this; see N3659, for shared_mutex. We made a mistake, and we corrected it, without trying to cover up the fact of the mistake. Clark _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
