On 12 January 2015 at 18:38, Nelson, Clark wrote: > I think that we're really suffering from trying to back-fill feature-testing > in cases where no thought was given to it on the front side. I think we need > to get the EWG and LEWG to think about what makes sense for feature-testing > before a feature is thrown over the wall to CWG/LWG. > > (Yes, I know -- in the specific case of digit separators, the political > situation meant there was never any hope that it could be handled entirely > by EWG; I'm talking about the general case.) > > Does anyone in SG10 consistently attend EWG or LEWG?
Am I "in" SG10 if I subscribe to this list? :-) I split my time between LWG and LEWG, and I am at least aware of most papers LEWG look at, so will try to remember to bring up the topic of feature-testing early on. _______________________________________________ Features mailing list [email protected] http://www.open-std.org/mailman/listinfo/features
