On Thursday 14 June 2007 05:08:33 Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Nothing is stopping me from packaging up anything. Although I still need > to be able to add complete directory trees that are not packaged. That's > why I asked if that is within pungi's roadmap or not.
I don't really think that it is. What I'm asking is /why/ the directory tree isn't packaged, or why can't it be packaged. What is the underlying real reason that you have to include an unpackaged tree? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
pgpz8otcNryJL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
