On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 10:57 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > > That's the log I can get for wormux.
> > >
> 
> > 
> > So you exclude wormux but not wormux-data?
> yes, to just exclude wormux, I think just appears wormux in duplicates
> and also is enough to solve the duplicated. 

Hi, updating the information : 

I build pungi-2.0.16 reverting this commit :
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pungi.git?p=pungi.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c4028447884828e01ff3769962011bc53c428d
and can confirm this commit is the one which breaks my "builds" .

About seeing logs, I just found extend logs recently and if you want see
it too: http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/f11/logs/i386.log

Analyzing logs: 
wormux-data is repeated and not detect by checkduplicated because one
is .i586 and other is .noarch (for example in 64 bits I can have same
package in .i586 and in .x86_64 and they aren't duplicated) 

Pungi.INFO: Checking deps of wormux.i586
yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 to require for 
wormux-data
yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.3-1.fc11.noarch to require 
for wormux-data
Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.noarch for wormux.i586
Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.i586 for wormux.i586

this looks (to me) wrong. 

hope that can help  
Thanks,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list

Reply via email to