On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 10:57 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > > > That's the log I can get for wormux. > > > > > > > > So you exclude wormux but not wormux-data? > yes, to just exclude wormux, I think just appears wormux in duplicates > and also is enough to solve the duplicated.
Hi, updating the information : I build pungi-2.0.16 reverting this commit : http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/pungi.git?p=pungi.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=44c4028447884828e01ff3769962011bc53c428d and can confirm this commit is the one which breaks my "builds" . About seeing logs, I just found extend logs recently and if you want see it too: http://sergiomb.no-ip.org/f11/logs/i386.log Analyzing logs: wormux-data is repeated and not detect by checkduplicated because one is .i586 and other is .noarch (for example in 64 bits I can have same package in .i586 and in .x86_64 and they aren't duplicated) Pungi.INFO: Checking deps of wormux.i586 yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.2-5.fc11.i586 to require for wormux-data yum.verbose.YumBase.DEBUG: Matched wormux-data-0.8.3-1.fc11.noarch to require for wormux-data Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.noarch for wormux.i586 Pungi.INFO: Added wormux-data.i586 for wormux.i586 this looks (to me) wrong. hope that can help Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list