http://fedora-commons.org/jira/browse/FCREPO-539
I'm drafting an ontology, and have a few questions for the developer community: 1. How important is an OWL ontology versus an RDF schema (eg, the Dublin Core scheme)? 2. If OWL is specifically desired, what flavor should be the target? I'm inclined to dismiss OWL (full) out of hand. DL has some support (cf. http://jena.sourceforge.net/inference/#owl). Lite will put some severe constraints on what the schema can assert. 3. Should the schema describe only the core system relationships (see http://fedora-commons.org/confluence/display/FCR30/Triples+in+the+Resource+Index ), or should it include the object properties with URIs in the fedora-model namespace? If the latter, should all the properties the fcrepo code knows about be included (see http://fedora-commons.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fedora-commons/fedora/trunk/fcrepo-common/src/main/java/fedora/common/rdf/FedoraModelNamespace.java?view=log )? That would drag some datastream properties into the mix. regards, Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
