Oof! I had thought the ECM ontology described individual Content Models. I think FCREPO-539 is just a documentation of the properties in the fedora-model namespace. I'll have another look ASAP. In the meantime, it was remiss of me not to include a Asger's ECM page in the background link of my original post:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/ecm/index.php?title=Ontology_Language One of the consequences of non-Full OWL is a more restricted way of dealing with enumerations (such as the values for the state property). This also touches on the question of what the relationship between the FOXML XML schema and a fedora-model OWL Ontology / RDF schema should be. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:12 AM, Asger Askov Blekinge <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > This is not so far away from what I did with Enhanced Content Models. I > am surprised you did not reference that in any way. Anyway. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
