Hi Dan, On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Davis <dda...@fedora-commons.org> wrote: > [..] > Part of this may be the view that Fedora is a "product" to be deployed > rather than a set of libraries to be built into a "product" by a third > party. And the derived product is deployed into an execution > environment. Supported by whoever built the derived product. If so, > future refactorings of Fedora could keep this in mind --- to optimize to > support build processes and largely drop the notion of a deployment > (installer) altogether. The modularity has kind of been going in that > direction for a while anyway. > [..]
I think there's room for both a standalone, deployable Fedora distribution as well as third-party Fedora-embedding solutions that do additional stuff (eSciDoc, Hydra, Islandora). The move to Spring is certainly starting to open up even more possibilities for bundling. But I still feel like a standalone deployable Fedora war remains an important option for people (developers building bigger systems, mostly). - Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FREE DOWNLOAD - uberSVN with Social Coding for Subversion. Subversion made easy with a complete admin console. Easy to use, easy to manage, easy to install, easy to extend. Get a Free download of the new open ALM Subversion platform now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-developers mailing list Fedora-commons-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-developers
