Steve can probably comment more meaningfully on this, but the way I interpret the proposal for FCREPO-652 (a graph per object) is that it would *not* break backward compatibility because the <#ri> (whole graph) view would still behave as before. The dependency on mulgara isn't so concerning if this (and thus FCREPO-656) is considered an optional feature.
So on the surface, this seems compatible with a point release (e.g. 3.5), but I'd hesitate to put it in the bucket without having a reasonable expectation that it might possibly get proven out and done in that timeframe. It looks like a it'd be a fairly significant effort, and I currently don't know of anyone planning on working on it in the short term. It seems that a proof of concept impl behind the idea would be good in any case -- something to help answer the basic feasibility questions. - Chris On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: > Is there any chance to get FCREPO-652: "Restructure resource index as a set > of named graphs" into that list, or is that still some further ways out? It's > of particular interest to us in connection with FCREPO-656: "Support for > indexing "arbitrary" RDF datastreams in the resource index". > > I understand that there was some concern about inducing too strong a > dependency on Mulgara for this functionality-- has that been addressed? > > --- > A. Soroka > Digital Research and Scholarship R & D and Online Library Environment > the University of Virginia Library > > > > > On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Chris Wilper wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> A lot of what's discussed on that page is still in the investigation >> phase, but some concrete tracker items have been provoked by it. >> >> So far, FCREPO-649 and FCREPO-650 (mark the old "LITE" apis as >> deprecated, and the REST API >> URIs as canonical, respectively) are scoped for 3.5. These will both >> help pave the way for FCREPO-655 (Support HTTP URIs for resources in >> the Resource Index), which would be a more likely candidate for a 4.0 >> release, since it's got potential to break back-compatibility with >> existing applications. >> >> Re: 3.5 A couple weeks ago, Aaron Birkland (the 3.5 release manager) >> and I had a good initial scoping discussion for the release and took >> our best guess at this stuff. But we're really hoping to solicit more >> input from the community on priorities. Besides volunteering to work >> on issues that are important to you, another great way to help us >> prioritize is by logging in and voting on issues in the tracker. >> >> Here's the 3.5-scoped list currently. These items are considered "fair >> game" for the next release, meaning that if we can get people >> (committers and otherwise) to sign up to help with them, they'll be >> included in the release. >> >> https://jira.duraspace.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FCREPO+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22Fedora+3.5%22+ORDER+BY+status+DESC%2C+priority+DESC >> >> - Chris >> >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Alex Rodriguez Lopez >> <alo...@flordeutopia.pt> wrote: >>> Thanks Chris, >>> >>> and happy to know 3.5 is comming early next year. >>> >>> Any insights about this on the upcoming release?: >>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data >>> >>> Chris Wilper, 15-12-2010 14:45: >>>> Hi Alex, >>>> >>>> The Fedora jars are currently not deployed to a m2 repository. We are >>>> planning on doing that for the 3.5 release early next year: >>>> >>>> https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-825 >>>> >>>> ..but for the time being, building and deploying to your own local >>>> repo will be necessary. >>>> >>>> - Chris >>>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Alex Rodriguez Lopez >>>> <alo...@flordeutopia.pt> wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> I would like to reuse some of the java classes in Fedora's source for my >>>>> app, in which I use Maven for dependency control. >>>>> >>>>> After some of searching I couldn't find a Maven dependency to add to my >>>>> POM so I don't have to "install" the jars to my local M2_REPO. >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone know the lines to add to my POM to add Fedora >>>>> sources?(Muradora would be nice too!). >>>>> >>>>> Just so is it clear, I do not intend to change or develop Fedora (I did >>>>> found some docs about how to setup an environment to do this), just >>>>> reuse some classes for my client app. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Alex >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Lotusphere 2011 >> Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how >> to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment >> to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lotusphere 2011 > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
