Chris-- Thanks for those insights-- they clarify the issues involved.
--- A. Soroka Digital Research and Scholarship R & D and Online Library Environment the University of Virginia Library On Dec 15, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Chris Wilper wrote: > Steve can probably comment more meaningfully on this, but the way I > interpret the proposal for FCREPO-652 (a graph per object) is that it > would *not* break backward compatibility because the <#ri> (whole > graph) view would still behave as before. The dependency on mulgara > isn't so concerning if this (and thus FCREPO-656) is considered an > optional feature. > > So on the surface, this seems compatible with a point release (e.g. > 3.5), but I'd hesitate to put it in the bucket without having a > reasonable expectation that it might possibly get proven out and done > in that timeframe. It looks like a it'd be a fairly significant > effort, and I currently don't know of anyone planning on working on it > in the short term. > > It seems that a proof of concept impl behind the idea would be good in > any case -- something to help answer the basic feasibility questions. > > - Chris > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:07 PM, <aj...@virginia.edu> wrote: >> Is there any chance to get FCREPO-652: "Restructure resource index as a set >> of named graphs" into that list, or is that still some further ways out? >> It's of particular interest to us in connection with FCREPO-656: "Support >> for indexing "arbitrary" RDF datastreams in the resource index". >> >> I understand that there was some concern about inducing too strong a >> dependency on Mulgara for this functionality-- has that been addressed? >> >> --- >> A. Soroka >> Digital Research and Scholarship R & D and Online Library Environment >> the University of Virginia Library >> >> >> >> >> On Dec 15, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Chris Wilper wrote: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> A lot of what's discussed on that page is still in the investigation >>> phase, but some concrete tracker items have been provoked by it. >>> >>> So far, FCREPO-649 and FCREPO-650 (mark the old "LITE" apis as >>> deprecated, and the REST API >>> URIs as canonical, respectively) are scoped for 3.5. These will both >>> help pave the way for FCREPO-655 (Support HTTP URIs for resources in >>> the Resource Index), which would be a more likely candidate for a 4.0 >>> release, since it's got potential to break back-compatibility with >>> existing applications. >>> >>> Re: 3.5 A couple weeks ago, Aaron Birkland (the 3.5 release manager) >>> and I had a good initial scoping discussion for the release and took >>> our best guess at this stuff. But we're really hoping to solicit more >>> input from the community on priorities. Besides volunteering to work >>> on issues that are important to you, another great way to help us >>> prioritize is by logging in and voting on issues in the tracker. >>> >>> Here's the 3.5-scoped list currently. These items are considered "fair >>> game" for the next release, meaning that if we can get people >>> (committers and otherwise) to sign up to help with them, they'll be >>> included in the release. >>> >>> https://jira.duraspace.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+FCREPO+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%22Fedora+3.5%22+ORDER+BY+status+DESC%2C+priority+DESC >>> >>> - Chris >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Alex Rodriguez Lopez >>> <alo...@flordeutopia.pt> wrote: >>>> Thanks Chris, >>>> >>>> and happy to know 3.5 is comming early next year. >>>> >>>> Any insights about this on the upcoming release?: >>>> https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/FCREPO/Supporting+the+Semantic+Web+and+Linked+Data >>>> >>>> Chris Wilper, 15-12-2010 14:45: >>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>> >>>>> The Fedora jars are currently not deployed to a m2 repository. We are >>>>> planning on doing that for the 3.5 release early next year: >>>>> >>>>> https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-825 >>>>> >>>>> ..but for the time being, building and deploying to your own local >>>>> repo will be necessary. >>>>> >>>>> - Chris >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Alex Rodriguez Lopez >>>>> <alo...@flordeutopia.pt> wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> I would like to reuse some of the java classes in Fedora's source for my >>>>>> app, in which I use Maven for dependency control. >>>>>> >>>>>> After some of searching I couldn't find a Maven dependency to add to my >>>>>> POM so I don't have to "install" the jars to my local M2_REPO. >>>>>> >>>>>> Does anyone know the lines to add to my POM to add Fedora >>>>>> sources?(Muradora would be nice too!). >>>>>> >>>>>> Just so is it clear, I do not intend to change or develop Fedora (I did >>>>>> found some docs about how to setup an environment to do this), just >>>>>> reuse some classes for my client app. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Lotusphere 2011 >>> Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how >>> to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment >>> to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fedora-commons-users mailing list >>> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Lotusphere 2011 >> Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how >> to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment >> to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Fedora-commons-users mailing list >> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Lotusphere 2011 > Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how > to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment > to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-commons-users mailing list > Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots, take your collaborative environment to the next level, and enter the era of Social Business. http://p.sf.net/sfu/lotusphere-d2d _______________________________________________ Fedora-commons-users mailing list Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
