Dear Fedora Community,

I'd like to ask your help about the following.
We are trying to build a Fedora Repository in our institution (connected with 
Apache Solr and some search & discovery interface) and while we are designing 
the
appropriate content model, we are facing the following problem:

In several of our collection we would like to manage compound objects 
so we would like to store the following:
- Item Description (based on a metadata schema)
- Master file (example: every page is a tiff file)
- Derivative Level 1 (example: every page is a jpg file)
- Derivative Level 2 (example: a multi-page pdf document)
- Technical Metadata for every master and derivative file.

We looked the fedora documentation, tutorials, conference materials, and we 
came up 
two different scenarios:

1. We are creating one Fedora Object per Item.
   This object will include one Item Description datastream, several Master and 
derivative file datastream, 
   and several Technical Metadata datastream. The relationship (isDerivativeOf, 
isTechnicalMetadataOf) 
   between these objects will provided by a huge RELS-INT datastream.
   
2. According to the presentation 
(http://prezi.com/wvfmak-ncfsq/beyond-the-tutorial-complex-content-models-in-fedora-3x/)
   we are creating atomic Fedora objects (so one page will be one Fedora 
object, containing a Master File datastream, a 
   Derivative File datastream, and a Technical Metadata datastream). Relation 
to the item will be provided by the RELS-EXT
   datastream. 
   
Unfortunately the closest thing what I was able to find is the above mentioned 
presentation, there are no RELS-INT examples
existing, and reading the Mailing-List debate about RELS-INT 
(http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-commons-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00418.html)
confused me a little bit about the future of the RELS-INT. Is there a Fedora 
Commons Best Practice existing for storing compund objects?

And another interesting part is, how should I store the order of the pages? 
Should I include a datastream containing the Structural section of a METS 
document?
Or should I create some meaningful relationships to use RELS-INT/RELS-EXT?

If somebody has an experience, or faced these issues before, I'd appreciate if 
you could share your expereinces, even recommendations,
or just simply list the pros and cons of each solutions.

Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Jozsef


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer -- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better 
price-free! And you'll get a free "Love Thy Logs" t-shirt when you
download Logger. Secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsisghtdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to