It's a good deal more common to have the relation pointing the other way. Is 
there a particular reason you chose for parent->child? There might be a better 
(more performant) way to get the same effect.

---
A. Soroka
Software & Systems Engineering :: Online Library Environment
the University of Virginia Library

On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Benjamin Armintor wrote:

> Speaking of which: Rasta, your collection object is probably going to have 
> some poor performance associated with it.  I would really consider:
> 1. Not versioning RELS-EXT
> 2. Having your membership relation point the other way, or
> 3. Upgrading to a version of Fedora that will allow you to store RELS-EXT as 
> a managed (type M) datastream.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Benjamin Armintor <armin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given the problem Rasta describes, I'd bet that column is incrementing 
> datastream versions.  His collection object's RELS-EXT is going to have more 
> than 32k versions.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Edwin Shin <ed...@fedora-commons.org> wrote:
> This was addressed in Fedora 3.5:
>          https://jira.duraspace.org/browse/FCREPO-952
> 
> I don't remember off the top of my head what that counter is used for--maybe 
> one of the other committers can chime in. I think I might just try changing 
> the column to an int, however.
> 
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Rastislav Hudak <hudak.rastis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > we have a 3.3 installation and in the doRegistry table the systemVersion 
> > column is defined as smallint.
> >
> > Now we have collection objects, but we define the collection the other way 
> > around, so in the collection's RELS-EXT there are all the 
> > hasCollectionMember relations (instead of isCollectionMember in each 
> > member).
> >
> > After an upload of ca 40k objects over the time which all had to be 
> > assigned to one collection (addRelationship) I'm starting to get "Out of 
> > range value adjusted for column 'systemVersion'".
> >
> > I don't see this value in foxml, how does it act in fedora? What can I 
> > expect is now broken as the counter is overflown? Can I ignore it or reset 
> > it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Rasta
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d_______________________________________________
> Fedora-commons-users mailing list
> Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Fedora-commons-users mailing list
Fedora-commons-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fedora-commons-users

Reply via email to