Debayan Banerjee wrote: > Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs > have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the > distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess > both vim and emacs should be available.
Both vim and Emacs are obsolescent and hard to use. Kate FTW!
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
