Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416





--- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla <[email protected]>  2009-01-22 09:52:42 EDT ---
1. I see.  Sorry, new to fonts.

2. Ahhh.  Makes sense.  Should %{name}-fonts-common then be required by {%name}
but not the other way round?

3. rpmlint will yell about that.

4. Not sure what I would say, honestly.

5. I'll have a go.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list

Reply via email to