Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477416 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-01-22 10:06:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > 1. I see. Sorry, new to fonts. np, still documenting this > 2. Ahhh. Makes sense. Should %{name}-fonts-common then be required by > {%name} > but not the other way round? %{name} should require the font packages, and they will drag in common > 3. rpmlint will yell about that. rpmlint is not always right. Ask skvidal on irc if you don't believe me. Provides: oldname is only necessary if other packages depend on oldname and you don't want them to change > 4. Not sure what I would say, honestly. I know, probably need to ask on the oflb mailing list what a good description would be (or find one on wikipedia) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
