Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-05-10 12:10:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > No. upgrading path from F-10 -> F-11 MUST be preserved. > This is not related to font packaging policy. The upgrade path DOES work within Fedora. (see comment #7) That third party packages fail is none of our problem. And a metapackage is certainly not needed. In fact a large part of the liberation spec ugly-ness is due to mixing in metapackage patterns. However even though this mixing makes it difficult to understand it should still work ok. Anyway, 1. re: Conflicts: liberation-fonts < 1.04.93-8 ⇒ request by the yum folks to workaround a groupupdate yum misbehaviour 2. re: Obsoletes: liberation-sans-fonts < 1.04.93-8 Provides: liberation-sans-fonts = %{version}-%{release} ⇒ totally unnecessary, though harmless Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < xxxx would have made sense if it had ever been pushed to users -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
