Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497646 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot <[email protected]> 2009-05-13 03:39:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > I think we need just: > > > > Obsoletes: liberation-fonts-sans < 1.04.93-4 > > > > and similarly for mono and serif. > > No, you don't need that since it's already automatically done by rpm. You can > remove those lines altogether. Read again. As for your patch, I'm strongly against it. 1. you're introducing a common provides while making sure packagers had to take into account the different fonts was an explicit packaging goal 2. as far as I understand, you're relying on undocumented yum behaviour the yum developpers never committed to If you want to change the way we package fonts, go the full public consultation => FPC review => FESCO review => months of QA like was done for F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
