On 4/30/07, Gerold Kassube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it is a "nice to have" ...
not a "must" to have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Why everybody want to discuss decissions?
Sometimes, I thought I better took the red pill ...
Regards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think there has been a mis-interpretation in following line:
* All alises for the ambassadors must be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What it really means, if someone *really* needs to use name based
email alias, we must use "FirstName.LastName" convention.
This does not change anything in new policy which is we use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] by default.
Until the new policy implemented, many of our Ambassadors have been
using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for their contacts.
As you know, in the lines of marketing business, changes of email
address/alias can be critical. So we're trying to minimize this issue.
We can assure you, we won't just give away [EMAIL PROTECTED] to
anyone. We're making *exceptions* to just the few.
Regards.
--
Thomas Chung
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasChung
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
