Mike McGrath schrieb:
So the firstname.lastname removal has been done and went fairly well
with one exception. Many of the ambassadors use firstname.lastname
when dealing with other people. They like a good, professional
looking email address. Unfortunately, not everyone thinks of this
when they're creating their account name and trying to be an
ambassador with [EMAIL PROTECTED] may cause issues.
I've added a few exceptions but I really don't want our group
maintaining this list. We're not in the business of user
administration, that always gets delegated to the specific group
owners/admins. This puts us in an awkward position because of the
sensitive nature of the alises file we can't just let everyone edit
this file. Here's what I'd like to propose:
Thomas Chung has offered to maintain this list for the ambassadors.
Since its a manual intervention we're not as open to attack/collisions
as we were when it was automated. We'll continue to use CVS so we get
notifications when a change goes out. Additionally I've given the
following guidelines to Thomas should we chose to go this route:
* All alises for the ambassadors must be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Exceptions are made by Thomas Chung for the ambassadors only. He
has the final say as to whether someone is eligible for the alias
* Careful precautions must be made to not cause collisions. (This
would include looking out for suspicious aliases like
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any issues / concerns with this?
No. It's fine; If you have some 'strange looking' login/account-name
like the fluffyone23 you mentioned, it's better to go with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For me [EMAIL PROTECTED] is fine. :-)
Best,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
