On 6/9/06, seth vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 23:53 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and
> FC1/2. We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and
> they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards. Our
> lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and FC2
> would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3 and FC4.
> The RHL releases are a different matter.
>
+1 for killing rhl 7.3, 9, fc1 and fc2 when fc4 comes in.
I think so too. If people need support for RHL-7.3/9 they need to pay
someone to support it or move to something else. The amount of time
trying to get a patched set done, tested, and finished is a full-time
job for people.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
