On Jul 14, 2008, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> RMS actually has a social reason for his request.  What is the
>> reason behind those who refuse?

> Respect for all the other organizations and authors who have
> contributed to the packages within the various Linux-based
> distributions, yet who do not get credited in the name "GNU/Linux" ?

Again, circular reasoning.  You're talking about GNU+Linux-based
distributions.  You're absolutely correct that some don't get credited
by GNU+Linux, but how is that a logical reason to credit the smaller
contributor Linux and not the larger contributor GNU?  This is covered
in the FAQ, BTW, starting at 
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#many

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist  [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member       ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org}

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Reply via email to