On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:57:53AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:

> Note that some discussions on LWN concerning whether kernel bugs with security
> implications were being clearly labelled as such, suggests that the -97
> kernel included security fixes. As such pushing those updates out a bit faster
> may have been justified.

And -86?  And -55?  Seems like there was another as well..

Perhaps we need to do security fixes through a different process,
rather than just rushing-out security fixes on top of whatever is in
HEAD whether it has been tested by users or not...

John
-- 
John W. Linville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

Reply via email to