William Case wrote: > My question is this: These memos are entitled Requests for Comments and > each have received several detailed and learned comments, yet, the RFC > seems to become adopted as written with the comments only attached but > not adopted. I am I misreading the actual RFC process?
"Request for comments" is a misnomer nowadays. The documents are called RFCs because of tradition, but the right stage for commenting is while they are Internet-Drafts, before they become RFCs. When minor errors are found in a published RFC, an erratum may be published. If more substantial changes are needed, a new RFC is written and the old one becomes obsolete. You might want to read RFC 2026, titled "The Internet Standards Process – Revision 3": http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026 Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
