Hi Aaron, On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 17:31, Aaron Konstam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 16:35 -0300, Andre Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just realized that, even though /etc/sysconfig/irqbalance has > > > > ONESHOT= > > > > irqbalance runs only once and then bails out (at least it seems to be > > gracefully). This is what happens if I try to run it by hand: > > > > root:~# irqbalance --debug > > Package 0: cpu mask is 00000003 (workload 0) > > Cache domain 0: cpu mask is 00000003 (workload 0) > > CPU number 0 (workload 0) > > CPU number 1 (workload 0) > > Interrupt 20 (class ethernet) has workload 1 > > Interrupt 8 (class timer) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 0 (class timer) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 17 (class storage) has workload 21 > > Interrupt 21 (class storage) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 16 (class legacy) has workload 123 > > Interrupt 22 (class legacy) has workload 81 > > Interrupt 1 (class legacy) has workload 1 > > Interrupt 23 (class legacy) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 19 (class legacy) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 18 (class legacy) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 9 (class legacy) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 6 (class legacy) has workload 0 > > Interrupt 4 (class other) has workload 0 > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > IRQ delta is 1892 > > Package 0: cpu mask is 00000003 (workload 1154) > > Cache domain 0: cpu mask is 00000003 (workload 1153) > > CPU number 0 (workload 508) > > Interrupt 17 (storage/91) > > Interrupt 22 (legacy/412) > > Interrupt 23 (legacy/0) > > Interrupt 18 (legacy/0) > > Interrupt 6 (legacy/0) > > CPU number 1 (workload 645) > > Interrupt 20 (ethernet/10) > > Interrupt 21 (storage/8) > > Interrupt 16 (legacy/621) > > Interrupt 19 (legacy/0) > > Interrupt 9 (legacy/0) > > Interrupt 1 (legacy/0) > > Interrupt 4 (other/0) > > > > After this, it just quits with status 0, and /var/run/irqbalance.pid > > is removed. > > > > Is this normal behavior? (manpage says it should keep balancing IRQs > > each 10s if ONESHOT is not set) > > > > Version is irqbalance-0.55-9.fc9.x86_64 > > > > Regards, > > > > Andre > That is interesting because the big leap forward in 2.6.x kernels is to > have scheduling lists that balance the work more efficiently among cpus. > You mean that irqbalance isn't really needed with 2.6 kernels? I'm not sure I need to run it, but since I am, it feels strange that it stops after the first run, even if (apparently) not told to do so...
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
