On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Rahul Sundaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael J Gruber wrote: > >> - Fedora's key will be changed, not RHEL's, which has been compromised. > > No indication of the latter. The setup is different. Refer > > http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200701300906.html
Only if you define "compromised" as possession of the unencrypted private key. The RHEL signing keys have, however, been used by an unauthorized party to sign unauthorized packages. Some people would say that that qualified as "compromised" on any reasonable definition. Incidentally, what does "with high probability" mean? Anything more than "we're pretty sure, but we can't really say how sure"? Cheers, Miles -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
