Timothy Murphy wrote:
(2) I understand - and understood - perfectly clearly the cause of the ERROR.
If you do, you aren't describing it correctly.
(3) If ScientificLinux runs a web-page that fails in Firefox, I put the fault down to ScientificLinux.
It didn't fail in firefox; you told firefox you didn't trust them and firefox responded according to your wishes. No error was involved - unless you did want to see the page.
(4) As I have said (several times) I do not have a passionate interest in ScientificLinux, which according to all the comments I have read here is more or less identical to CentOS.
Actually I don't think I've seen a good description of the differences. Both should have a fairly accurate rebuild of RHEL sources and timely updates from their repositories, but each has their own optional added-value content. Centos has the Centosplus repository with a kernel containing some drivers and filesystems present in fedora but removed from RHEL and some other things. I'm not sure what SL adds.
-- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
