William Case wrote: > > It's OK Mikkel, I gotcha anyways. I have checked rc.sysinit and it does > a > 'if [ -x /sbin/lvm ]; then > action $"Setting up Logical Volume Management:" /sbin/lvm vgchange -a y > --ignorelockingfailure > fi > > I have no use for lvm. I have thought of either commenting out the > above statement, or, 'yum remove lvm2' which has a mkinitrd dependency. > > Which or whatelse would be the least dangerous? Where did the /sbin/lvm > come from? I have been careful to NOT install LVM with each new fedora > installation. If it is being added by the latest kernel upgrade, would > not this addition of LVM to the rc.sysinit script be a bug?
Take a look at the timestamps on rc.sysinit - I think it has always been in there. Considering how seldom the initscripts are updated, you are probably safe with either option. In your case, I would probably remove the lvm2 package. (rpm -e --nodeps lvm2) The only problem would be if you get a drive that has LVM that you need to read... Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
