Antonio Olivares wrote:
>--- On Sat, 11/15/08, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>From: Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Make a DHCP server using Fedora - Help
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for
>>using Fedora." <[email protected]>
>>Date: Saturday, November 15, 2008, 1:57 AM
>>On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 17:42 -0800, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>
>>
>>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
>>>}
>>>
>>># This is a very basic subnet declaration.
>>>
>>>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224 {
>>> range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
>>> option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,
>>>
>>>
>>rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
>>
>>
>>>}
>>>
>>>
>>It seems pointlessly redundant to declare a subnet twice.
>>And stranger
>>to declare it differently. I see no point for the first
>>one.
>>
>>--
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -r
>>2.6.26.6-79.fc9.i686
>>
>>Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox
>>is ignored. I
>>read messages from the public lists.
>>
>>
>
>Which one should I keep Tim, the first one or the second one?
>
>I have tried before and not succeeded, I want to succeed this time.
>
>The machine that will become the server has gateway 10.154.19.1, is it okay to
>make the server
>10.154.19.0 ?
>
>Also the machine's netmask is 255.255.255.0 and the netmask of the server
>should it be 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 or other thing?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Antonio
>
Dear You,
Please try these :
<>subnet 10.154.19.0 netmask 255.255.255.224
{
range 10.154.19.10 10.154.19.20;
option routers rtr-239-0-1.example.org,rtr-239-0-2.example.org;
}
Good luck !
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
