M. Fioretti wrote:
> The reasons for that are not worth discussing here, but this is why I am > ignoring SELinux **for the moment**. Again, suggestions are welcome, but I > will have to apply them _after_ I have finished those other things. At > that point, I'll either fix SELinux or just reinstall from scratch... Surely SELINUX=permissive should be the same in practice as SELINUX=disabled? Wouldn't it be a bug if they weren't the same? -- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
