On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 18:57 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2008 10:06:53 -0700, Craig wrote:
>
> > Only problem I see remaining in upgrade (via preupgrade) is
> > nspr/nspr-devel...(I downloaded these packages manually via
> > yumdownloader)
> >
> > # ls -l nspr-*
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 125009 2008-12-06 10:03
> > nspr-4.7.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 115693 2008-12-06 10:03
> > nspr-devel-4.7.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm
> >
> > # rpm -Uvh nspr-*
> > Preparing... ###########################################
> > [100%]
> > package nspr-4.7.3-1.1.fc9.i386 (which is newer than
> > nspr-4.7.3-1.fc10.i386) is already installed
> > package nspr-devel-4.7.3-1.1.fc9.i386 (which is newer than
> > nspr-devel-4.7.3-1.fc10.i386) is already installed
> >
> > Obviously, I can remove the F9 packages via --nodeps and install the F10
> > packages but I think there is an incremental problem that needs to be
> > fixed somewhere/somehow
>
> Yes. Its package maintainers needs to be educated about how to
> increase package release correctly when using the %{?dist} macro.
>
> Please file a bug report:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/nspr
----
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475014
Craig
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
