On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Murphy <gayle...@eircom.net> wrote: >> MKas wrote: >> >>> I like KDE, but what I see: >>> >>> bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome* >> >> Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE? > > > True. But it makes the arguement that KDE in Fedora is vibrant more > difficult when you can't have KDE without Gnome. > > bluez i386 4.19-1.fc10 installed 979 > k > firefox i386 3.0.5-1.fc10 installed 14 > M > firstboot i386 1.102-1.fc10 installed 652 > k > kdeutils i386 6:4.1.3-1.fc10 installed 5.6 > M > setroubleshoot noarch 2.0.12-3.fc10 installed 275 > k > system-config-date noarch 1.9.34-1.fc10 installed 3.8 > M > system-config-keyboard noarch 1.2.15-4.fc10 installed 189 > k > system-config-network noarch 1.5.93-2.fc10 installed 1.8 > M > system-config-printer i386 1.0.12-2.fc10 installed 1.6 > M > system-config-samba noarch 1.2.67-3.fc10 installed 2.1 > M > system-config-services noarch 0.99.28-3.fc10 installed 1.5 > M > xulrunner i386 1.9.0.5-1.fc10 installed 22 > M > > None of the above should need gnome libs to work. gtk libs, sure.. but > not Gnome. >
Yes, I have a lot of *gnome* package in my customized XFCE *only* desktop spin :-) That's the life, I have to live with :-) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
