On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Will btfrs file system obsolete LVM? (Rahul Sundaram) > 2. Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size (Aaron Konstam) > 3. Samba problem (Paul Smith) > 4. Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux (g) > 5. Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size (Patrick O'Callaghan) > 6. Re: gdm - displaying of information/ F10 (Mail Lists) > 7. Routing problem - was FC9 Linux gateways, VPN working, IP > forwarding isn't (Gary Stainburn) > 8. Re: F10+ Burn multiple discs concurrent from iso? > (Mikkel L. Ellertson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:28:08 +0530 > From: Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Will btfrs file system obsolete LVM? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Leslie Satenstein wrote: > > My question is in the subject line. > > > > Btrfs will take more time to mature (maybe a couple more releases > atleast) but essentially, yes. > > Btrfs features are listed in > > http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page > > Rahul > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:03:28 -0600 > From: Aaron Konstam <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <1232809408.3158.25.ca...@cyrus> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:42 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > > > This is explained in nearly all textbooks on Computer Architecture. So > > > the question remains, where is the address space in Linux. > > > > Patrick isn't the only one confused by your question. I can't make > > heads or tails of it. Are you asking where the mapping between the > > virtual address space and physical memory is done, or what? > > > No I am asking where the virtual address space resides of the machine. > -- > ======================================================================= > Pie are not square. Pie are round. Cornbread are square. > ======================================================================= > Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [email protected] > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:05:22 +0000 > From: Paul Smith <[email protected]> > Subject: Samba problem > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Dear All, > > I could access to a directory in my F10 partition from a VMware > virtual machine (MS Windows2000) through Samba, but not now. This is > very strange because I have not changed any samba settings. Any ideas? > > Thanks in advance, > > Paul > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:31:24 +0000 > From: g <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux > To: fedora-list <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Tim wrote: > > > A Dlink DIR-300. I'm none-too-impressed with it, for more than just > > that reason. > > it is nice to 'be true to your native country', but some times a simple > search on google will help you make up your mind. > > -- > peace out. > > tc,hago. > > g > . > > **** > in a free world without fences, who needs gates. > ** > help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today > ** > to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; > to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. > ** > learn linux: > 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html > 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ > 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html > 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ > **** > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 189 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/a70977a3/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:43:42 -0430 > From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 09:03 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:42 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > > > > > This is explained in nearly all textbooks on Computer Architecture. > So > > > > the question remains, where is the address space in Linux. > > > > > > Patrick isn't the only one confused by your question. I can't make > > > heads or tails of it. Are you asking where the mapping between the > > > virtual address space and physical memory is done, or what? > > > > > No I am asking where the virtual address space resides of the machine. > > No, sorry, nothing coming through. The question as phrased makes no > sense. > > If you're asking where does a given address in the virtual address space > map to, it depends on whether the corresponding page of the process > address space is currently in RAM, or on backing store (disk or > whatever), or nowhere because it hasn't been allocated, but the question > "where is the address space" has no meaning. > > Furthermore, the *machine* as such has no "virtual address space". > > poc > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:29:53 -0500 > From: Mail Lists <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: gdm - displaying of information/ F10 > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On 01/24/2009 09:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 22:50 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: > >> Our policy is to minimize information leakage - we recently switched > >> from kdm/kde to gdm/gnome and I cannot find how to adjust gdm greeter to > >> achieve : > > > > Dear Mr Lists > > I did put my name at the bottom. > > > > > Have you considered using kdm with Gnome? > > Yep, as I said in the original post > > ++ I did try kdm but there was some nasty white flash before the blue > ++ background was loaded as gnome/metacity was started by kdm) > > This was only on one computer where I ran the test, a lenovo laptop > with nvidia graphics. Its a possible workaround for gdm - I am still > wondering how to do it with gdm tho'. We are obviously most concerned > with laptops rather than desktops. > > As an aside, we plan to revisit kde periodically to see if its > usability and configurabilty are maturing back to kde 3.5 type of > levels. Fro the time being we have switched to gnome. > > Thanks for your suggestion > > gene/ > > > > > > poc > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:40:14 +0000 > From: Gary Stainburn <[email protected]> > Subject: Routing problem - was FC9 Linux gateways, VPN working, IP > forwarding isn't > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > On Saturday 24 January 2009 11:19:05 Giany wrote: > > If you say ip_forward is enabled then either there is a routing problem > > or some firewall issue. > > > > I've been going round in circles all day and now my head's spinning. I even > got it working once, but don't know how and can't repeat it. > > Iptables on all four machines set ACCEPT on INPUT, OUTPUT and FORWARD. IP > forwarding enabled on both gateways. > > This only leaves routing. > > Both gateways talk to each other. > Client and Server can talk to their local gateway > Local gateway can talk to remote server. > Remote gateway cannot talk to client > Client cannot talk to remote gateway or server > server cannot talk to local gateway or client > > Layout > > Client eth0 10.6.1.2/16 > > Network 10.6.0.0/16 > > Local GW eth0 10.6.1.1/16 > eth1 192.168.1.1/24 (internet connection) > ppp0 192.168.127.2/32 P-to-P 192.168.127.1 > > VPN ppp-over-ssh > > Remote eth0 10.1.1.115/16 > GW ppp1 192.168.127.1/32 P-to-P 192.168.127.2 > > Network 10.1.0.0/16 > > Server eth0 10.1.1.104 > > route tables > > Client > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 192.168.128.1 10.6.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 > eth0 > 192.168.127.1 10.6.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.6.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1 0 0 > eth0 > 0.0.0.0 10.6.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > > Local Gateway > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 192.168.127.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 > eth1 > 10.2.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 136.0.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 10.1.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 10.6.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.5.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 172.0.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > ppp0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth1 > 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth1 > > Remote Gateway > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 192.168.127.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 > ppp1 > 10.2.0.0 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 172.24.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.4.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.5.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 136.9.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.112 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > > Server > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface > 192.168.127.2 10.1.1.115 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.2.0.0 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 172.24.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.6.0.0 10.1.1.115 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.4.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 10.5.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 136.9.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 > eth0 > 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.112 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 > eth0 > > > > > > > -- > Gary Stainburn > > This email does not contain private or confidential material as it > may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown > and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:45:18 -0600 > From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: F10+ Burn multiple discs concurrent from iso? > To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using > Fedora." <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Robin Laing wrote: > > Frank Murphy wrote: > >> Can any of the fedora supplied, GUI Burners, > >> burn multiple copies concurrent. > >> Looking at setting up a PC based Duplicator. > >> > >> Any controller card better than another Fedora POV? > >> May 6 devices Internal. > >> > >> Frank > >> > > > > I think you would be better off using a script and a CLI tool. It isn't > > that hard. It may actually work better as each burner, even if > > identical will have different properties and operating characteristics. > > > > But you ask a good question and it will be interesting to see. > > I suspect that a SCSI controller, and an external LUN controller > with the drives in it would work better. I would not want the load > of 6 drives burring at the same time on the PC's power supply. > Depending on the burn speed, you might run into data transfer > problems on the PCI bus in any case. You could run external SATA > drives, but the cabling would be a problem and you still have the > PCI bus speed limit. > > Mikkel > -- > > Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, > for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! > > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: signature.asc > Type: application/pgp-signature > Size: 197 bytes > Desc: OpenPGP digital signature > Url : > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/561b043e/signature.bin > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 59, Issue 213 > ******************************************** >
-- fedora-list mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
