Kevin Kofler wrote:
solarflow99 wrote:
I wonder why that is? I never did come across the explanation..
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f9/en_US/sn-Virtualization.html
And despite the expectations, it didn't make F10 either...
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10/en_US/What_Do_System_Adminstrators_Care_About.html#sn-Virtualization
Kevin, thanks for that. I kind of gave up on xen and went to KVM just because it
was less hassle and I could see issues coming getting xen back in the kernel. I
just roll KVM machine from the command line for the most part, assuming they are
not servers. I don't have a good tool to put servers up without some hand work
to set up the bridging needed to establish a machine which appears to be separate.
I didn't know about xenner, but I'm not sure it actually would help, paravirt
under a KVM machine is unlikely to be better than just a KVM machine. In any
case now I see what's happening, and it sounds as if I went the right way.
--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
