Arthur Pemberton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Mike Chalmers <[email protected]> wrote:
Nothing else makes as much sense to me in the open source world that
isn't a 'paid' or 'enterprise' edition.
Mark we are definitely on the same page. Open source works together,
so it is very understandable why a rolling release is good, imo.
I hope you at least understand why a rolling release is technically
difficult, especially in a distro like Fedora where things can change
radically from one release to another.
Note that "things can change radically" without a release change... as anyone
who has used Fedora for a while will tell you. I'd still like to see an extra
six months of "Fedora Legacy" to fill the hole between cutting edge and
obsolete. Um, I mean stable of course. ;-)
--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
fedora-list mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
